親愛的讀者您好:BabyHome更新了隱私權條款說明,在您瀏覽本網站前,請閱讀 新版條款說明
育兒.持家.愛自己
誰不DIY
他的寶貝
他的興趣
文章分類
日期
#Tag
Hi~ 小寶真是可愛
資料載入中...
孩子參加冬令營 爸媽的行前秘笈 人本教育基金會提供 再一個多月就要過年了,家長們忙著為孩子安排新年假期,除了返鄉過年,讓孩子參加冬令營隊,也是一項不錯的選擇,在事前準備及營隊選擇上,家長們需要注意哪些事情呢?人本教育基金會以舉辦十七年森林育兒童營隊的經驗,給爸媽們一些具體的建議: 第一:孩子的獨立,要看長遠 如果孩子從來沒有參加過營隊,他可能擔心自己會想媽媽,交不到新朋友等等,這部份要請爸爸媽媽們先放下期待孩子獨立的心情,把眼光放長遠,將目標放在讓他有個美好的營隊回憶,對自己的獨立能力更有信心,除了把手機、行蹤等都告訴他,讓他隨時可以找到爸媽之外,也要讓他知道爸媽對他的疼惜,要花時間傾聽他,陪他度過一時的情緒低潮,甚至可以主動打電話給他,跟他分享你一天的生活,也聽聽他當天的生活,萬一必須中斷營隊回家,也不要當作一項挫敗,也盡量不要在出發前給予「要勇敢」「你是大孩子了」等壓力給小孩,以免他一味隱忍,反而少了情緒抒解及求助的機會。 第二:營隊的選擇,要以孩子的需要為出發 市面上的營隊,真是琳瑯滿目,有科學類、語文類、體能類、自然生態類,還有特定領域的專業營,除了考慮孩子的興趣,還可以有的思考點是,如果把參加營隊當作一種額外的學習,對孩子的負擔就太大了,忙碌了一個學期,參加營隊對孩子來說,就像大人出國充電一樣,是把所有的煩惱,包括學業、人際等都先放下的時候,對營隊的老師、同梯的小朋友來說,孩子是一個全新的人,有機會先忘記自己的缺點,有機會展現自己的長處,被人欣賞、接納,曾經有個小孩剛好參加一個大多數小朋友都比較文靜的梯隊,他就展現了平常在哥哥及強勢同學的照顧下,從來沒有機會展現的領導風格,讓來聽懇親會的媽媽嚇了一大跳,也讓他對自己更有信心。 第三:和他一起收拾行李,讓他做旅行的主人 決定要參加以後,接下來繁瑣的準備工作,也可以十分的有意義喔,我們的建議是,要讓孩子成為這趟旅行的主人,例如:和孩子一起收拾包包,陪他醞釀出外遊玩的心情,跟孩子聊聊自己過去參加旅行的趣事,談談自己如何跨出與人交往的第一步,那種有點期待,又有些害羞的心情。 讓孩子自己在物品上寫上自己的大名,或綽號,把收拾行李,擺放物品,當作一項遊戲,用「猜猜看,五天的生活,需要幾套怎樣的衣服?幾雙鞋?」讓孩子自己挑選。另外,把全部要帶的東西攤開來,依照使用的狀況思考怎麼擺放,例如:常用的東西像餐具及牙刷,跟不常用的手電筒及雨衣,是不是要分開放比較好? 總之,帶著孩子一起想,而不是幫他決定再要他記起來,要注意的是,進行的時候不能太嚴肅,愈輕鬆愈好,盡量不要用「自己的東西自己收」、「媽媽不在身邊,你要自己靠自己」這類強調責任與承擔的話語,那會增加孩子的壓力,也減少了對營隊的美好期待。 第四:生活標準的稍微降低,是可以被接受的 生活上的標準稍微降低一點是可以被接受的,不要把東西有沒有帶齊等事當作獨立與否的指標。 有些爸媽一接到孩子,第一句話就問「洗頭了沒?」或是「水壺有沒有帶回來?」把興致勃勃的正想跟爸媽說有多好玩多好玩的小孩口硬是堵住了,可惜的是,這樣就少了一段分享旅行趣事的甜蜜時光了。 第五:告訴孩子你想他 最後最後,接到孩子的時候,別忘了給他一個大大的擁抱,告訴他你有多想他! 讓孩子參加營隊,不但可以學習獨立,對父母來說,也是一個練習放手的機會,可別小看孩子,只要給他機會,他就迫不極待的要長大,展現出在我們保護下看不到的自信風采。 活動訊息: 人本冬令營隊,和爸媽一起努力,欣賞、陪伴孩子長大,今年寒假有「築巢」、「鐵馬醫師自由行」、「莎士比亞的奇想世界」、「飛行體驗營」等梯隊,歡迎家長詢問:(02)23661906-305,或上網http://www.hef.org.tw 財團法人人本教育文教基金會 張淑惠 森林育部主任 電話:02-23661906-302 傳真:02-23638215 e-mail:[email protected] 106台北市羅斯福路三段277號7樓 網址:http://www.hef.org.tw
昨天和老公把後陽台的花都搬上頂樓... 把它們一一散開擺好,希望能減少一些西曬的面積,這樣樓下才不會那麼熱... 今天,好像真的沒那麼熱了...也有可能是今天早上的風比較大,感覺不悶熱... 其實真正的考驗是下午,到時才知道效果如何... 後陽台淨空後,看起來真舒爽啊...那邊的地板應該至少10年不見天日了吧...就算是我幫忙整理出來的二袋垃圾(我不敢擅自作主丟掉)也放了二年,這次,告知老公後,我們就把它們拖出去斬了... 昨天,還把冰箱冷凍庫裡堆了不知多久的肉、水餃、魚等給清理出來,至於它們在那兒放了多久就懶得深究了...
Chapter 1 Curtains It’s dangerous to think too much about public education. So many things are wrong with it that it’s easier simply to go on a search-and-destroy mission and write only about the horror of it all. Those of us who have survived school have plenty of scars. Any person who has taught for more than a few years has met administrators, teachers, parents, and children who, as Mark Twain once remarked, ”make a body ashamed of the human race.” That’s not my mission here. More than anything else, this book is meant to be a reminder of what public education can be. But to understand where we might consider going, it becomes painfully necessary to examine some things that we usually try to avoid. I have one more objective, too: I want to give hope to young teachers who would like to run against the wind but are afraid of the consequences. I am living proof that you can have success as a teacher despite the many forces that are working against you. Like the Founding Fathers, I am a lover of independence, and freethinkers are not fash- ionable in public schools today. Instead, as public schools fail, bureaucrats are attempting to solve serious problems with simplistic solutions. They’re afraid to examine the real reasons why our schools are failing, so they use fashion- able words or pretty new textbooks to try and solve the very real problems that are destroying our classrooms. Poverty, greed, and incompetent teaching are just some of the reasons why Johnny not only can’t read but has no interest in reading. Using a new reading series or changing the classroom environment isn’t going to solve our problems. Most tragic of all, manydistricts are trying to take charge of education by forcing all teachers to use uniform lesson plans, by which all students will be guided in the same way at the same pace. This may be a comfort to young teachers who aren’t sure what to do every day, but I already know the inevitable result of uniform teaching: things will continue to be uniformly terrible. I’ve never been one of the masses, either as a parent or as a teacher. I will not let advertisers persuade me to see mediocre movies, and I do not watch a television show in order to converse with peers about it the following day. My life is my own. I don’t feel I have to buy in to the popular culture in order to be a successful teacher, parent, or person. But there are those to whom fitting in with the majority is important, and I have respect for that path; it’s just not the one I can follow, and these people may find the lessons I’ve learned irrelevant for their journey. However, if you’re a young teacher or parent who has often wanted to break from the pack but has been afraid to do so, I can tell you that I’ve done so and am still standing. I have many scars and bruises, but I have, as Robert Frost tells us, taken the road less traveled. And it’s made all the difference. Most teachers who are honest look back on their first years in the classroom through half-closed eyes. Teaching is a tough job at any time, and I’ve yet to meet anyone who excelled at it from the start. It takes years of experience to develop the wisdom that can lead to being a first-rate teacher.
I was definitely a slow learner, and I had an interesting but painful experience when I was student-teaching in UCLA’s Graduate School of Education program. I thought I was doing a pretty good job and was vigorously supported by the master teacher who supervised my work in her sixth-grade classroom. She particularly liked the reading program I designed for the students, most of whom spoke Spanish as their primary language. Rather than using the boring school reader assigned by the school district, I’d been reading the classics with these kids, and their reading and enthusiasm for literature increased enormously. For our final project of the year, we read Romeo and Juliet. My plan was to take the kids to the Franco Zeffirelli film on a weekend. It was playing in a revival house that showed classic films (this was before video made the showing of movies in class much easier). The children got very excited about this trip and read Romeo and Juliet with gusto. They were devastated on the Friday we finished when our principal sent me a note tell- ing me he had heard about my plan but that it was strictly forbidden to take students out on a Saturday. He went on to threaten that if the trip went ahead as planned, I would not receive a positive evaluation at the end of my student-teaching assignment. I was furious and just crumpled up his note. I had worked for two months to get the kids ready for this trip. Their parents were supportive, and many of them were coming to the movie with their children. I couldn’t believe the head of a school would want to prevent his kids from having a rewarding climax to their experience with Shakespeare. Looking back, I laugh at myself that a decision like that surprised me. I was so young. I stormed into the office, gave the crumpled note to the principal’s secretary, and told her to tell him where he could stick it. That afternoon, when I arrived at UCLA for my education classes, I was informed by one of the instructors that I had been suspended until a committee could decide if I had the moral character to be a good teacher. The fact that the movie trip was canceled was the least of my problems. I went home too angry to cry, and terrified at the thought of never teaching again. I had spent much of my life planning to be a teacher and now I had to consider the possibility that because of this stupid incident I might have to do something truly awful, like go to law school. This frustration was exacerbated when I received my first lesson in educational hypocrisy. There were rumors that the principal who was angry with me was having an affair with one of the teachers (they were both married), and that she was pregnant. Now, I’m no saint, but it was hard to have my moral integrity judged by this hypocrite. To make a long story short, they allowed me to go on being a teacher if I completely discounted the last six months of student teaching and repeated them. To punish me, they had me supervised by a struggling new teacher who had often come to me for assistance when we were attending class together the previous year. Despite her self-acknowledged shortcomings as a classroom leader, she graduated on time and got a job immediately. Well, I give them credit: if their goal was to humble me and teach me my place, they did so. I learned quickly that I was in no position to talk back to principals. I wanted to be a teacher so desperately that I swallowed my pride, said all the right things, and received my teach- ing credential the following year. I was so glad to survive this ordeal that I didn’t take the time to consider the les- son I should have been learning. I still mistakenly believed that this incident was an unusual one, and that when I was actually teaching and being paid for it, I’d be supervised by caring and able people who had dedicated their lives to the betterment of young human beings. I didn’t realize that many people, who may be good people, feel that working in schools is just a job and not a holy mission. Instead, I was more interested in the fact that within the next two years, the principal who had written me the note went through a divorce; his wife had never forgiven him when his illegitimate child was born. Sadly, a year later he was diagnosed with cancer and died soon after.
I had missed a crucial lesson here, but I would be given countless opportunities in the future to learn it. Public education is a mess, and I had survived my first scare by allowing the powers that be to force me to do exactly what they wanted. This is a natural danger for many young teachers. In truth, for many of us the initial objective is just to survive; we hope our lessons go smoothly and the clock runs quickly. For many novice teachers, there is no more wonderful sound than the dismissal bell signaling the end of the day. Consequently, in far too many classrooms the children’s edu- cation is not the main objective. Older teachers often mentor the young ones by teaching them survival tips that are fine for the beginning teacher but not helpful to the student. As a result, many young teachers believe they’re doing a good job when in fact they’re using smoke and mirrors. They have beautifully decorated classrooms with all the school standards created by some bureaucrat hanging on the wall. Their kids walk in straight lines, and order carries the day. It is painful to reflect on this, because that was my classroom for the first couple of years, and I, too, thought I was doing a good job. What’s more, the kids liked me. God, how foolish I feel now, remembering those desperate days. I actually worried more about the kids liking me than if they were reading well. But I was fortunate. I had planned to teach at a school in an economically disadvantaged neighborhood. Instead, I was assigned to a middle-class school with middle-class parents and middle-class values. There were only three hundred children at this school, and everybody spoke English. The kids had private music lessons at home. Everyone was on a soccer team or in a drama club or in an orchestra on Saturdays. They went to school liking their teachers before they had met them. I used to joke with my friends and tell them that I taught at a school called Camelot. I felt wonderful, until one day, by accident, a very nice little girl said something to me that started me down a different path. Our school was having a fund-raiser, and every teacher was supposed to contribute something for a silent auction. One teacher contributed tennis lessons; another was taking four kids to the movies. Since I loved Shakespeare, I planned a trip to the Old Globe Theater in San Diego for a group of about twenty-five students. The plan was for some parents, teachers, and me to drive the kids down for a weekend and two plays. The parents would pay for the trip and add about $25 extra. In this way the trip made a profit for the school while the kids had a good time and learned something. And they did indeed. The trip ran like clockwork. We stayed at a beautiful hotel with a Hawaiian atmosphere. The kids swam in an Olympic-size pool in the afternoons and returned to their lovely and spacious rooms to change before dinner. We saw two terrific plays: Rashomon and a particularly hilarious Merry Wives of Windsor. A splendid time was had by all.
It was Sunday afternoon and we were heading to the cars for our return to Los Angeles. Walking next to a perky little girl named Jenny, I said to her, ”Wasn’t this a fun weekend?” ”It sure was, Rafe.” ”Gorgeous hotel,” I remarked. ”It was okay,” Jenny answered vaguely. ”It wasn’t as nice as the ones I stay at in Hawaii and New York, but it was okay.” It didn’t hit me like a thunderbolt at first, but all during the drive back to L.A., I kept thinking about this little girl’s reaction to our weekend. I thought I had done something unique; I had wanted these days to mean something special to these kids and I had worked very hard to put it together. Yet the simple truth was that these were fortunate children who didn’t need me doing this for them. I spent the next few weeks observing my co-workers. Some of them were very good teachers; others were at best adequate. The majority of them took the path of least resistance. They were working with kids who were practically on autopilot and they were quite content to lay out the school textbooks, follow along chapter by chapter, and go home to their soap operas and bridge games with their social lives in order and consciences clear. There’s nothing wrong with this, of course, but it was wrong for me. As I was the new kid on the block, they often invited me out to dinner, and I started to realize that junior-high peer pressure was nothing compared to the pressures on teachers in an elementary school. ”We read our books this way.” ”We teach history this way.” ”Do things this way, Rafe, and you’ll get along well here.” They were right. Not only would I get along well, but also, at a rich school, the parents give you expensive presents at Christmas and at the end of the year. I was being paid for something I enjoyed doing, and still had health insurance and three months a year off. That’s a good gig, but I wasn’t happy. I started losing sleep and coming to school with knots in my stomach. Finally I figured out why this was happening. Camelot was too pleased with itself. The kids were good, but they weren’t that good. The school had a sort of 1950s feel to it, which was fine, but an occasional new idea was seen as a threat to the established order. Still, I never spoke up when I observed certain songs being sung or dances being performed, even though I knew I had ideas that might be better. I had learned my place. Unfortunately, I also learned, to my shock, that a few of my fellow teachers routinely cheated on standardized examinations to inflate test scores and build the school’s reputation in the community. Early in my first year, I attended a staff meeting at which standardized tests were the main topic of discussion. In those days, children in California took an exam known as the SES, or Survey of Essential Skills. It was a very easy test assessing the most basic abilities. Children at Camelot were encouraged to get 100 percent on this test, and were given a ”100%” button to wear around school if they did so. After the meeting, two highly respected teachers took me aside to show me a teaching technique that would help my students maximize their performance. This test was a multiple-choice exam for which the students blacked in the bubbles next to the answers on a computerized form. The teachers had a grid of bubbles that could be placed over a student’s answer sheet, and this grid’s holes revealed only the correct answers, so that a teacher could immediately spot how many questions had been missed. In some classes, when students announced they had finished their tests, they were told to come up to the teacher’s desk. The teacher would use her grid and tell the student that he or she ”had missed three-go back, find your mistakes, and return your paper again when you think you have 100 percent.”
”Isn’t that cheating?” I asked timidly. ”Of course not,” one teacher replied testily. ”I’m not telling the children the answer or which problem they missed-I’m simply encouraging them to get all the answers right. If they do, our school looks better when the scores are printed in the newspapers. And the higher our test scores, the more money we receive for various programs.” I was too intimidated to talk back to this veteran, but I did summon the nerve to bring it up with my principal when we were alone in his office. I told him I could never administer a test that way, and planned just to encourage the kids to do their best; when they missed answers, it simply meant that I would have to reteach those skills. I hoped that was okay. My principal shook his head and said that while he knew where I was coming from, he nevertheless was disappointed with my stubborn refusal to see the big picture. He said I had a lot to learn. I guess I did. I learned one thing from testing my students honestly, though: I began to sleep better. I no longer had knots in my stomach when I came to school. But I didn’t have the wisdom or sense to articulate to myself that I was beginning to define my mission as a teacher. I didn’t see the forest for the trees. Yet even in those early years, I was thinking a lot like Huck Finn, one of my heroes. There’s a marvelous section of Twain’s great novel in which Huck is confronted with one of his many serious moral dilemmas. He has begun to feel guilty about helping Jim, a runaway slave, gain his freedom. As society has taught Huck to do, he decides to turn Jim in the first chance he gets. As their raft floats along, they come upon two men who capture runaway slaves for a living. Huck has his chance to betray Jim and follow the rules of society. Instead, at the last minute, he lies to the men and saves his friend. Later, he feels even guiltier, believing he has done wrong. Yet, he thinks to himself, would he have felt better if he had turned Jim in and done right? As Huck says, ”What’s the use you learning to do right, when it’s troublesome to do right and ain’t no trouble to do wrong, and the wages is just the same? I was stuck. I couldn’t answer that. So I reckoned I wouldn’t bother no more about it, but after this always do whichever come handiest at the time.” Over the years, I’ve often applied Huck’s logic in my classroom, and been the better for it. I do not eat in the teachers’ lunchroom; instead, during recess and lunch I’ve struggled but managed to teach hundreds of children how to play guitar and other instruments. When my district assigns textbooks to the children that would cure the most seriously afflicted insomniac, I’ve used texts of my own choosing to inspire the children to dedicate themselves to their studies. While many teachers understandably go to after-school classes in order to earn credits leading to higher salaries, I’ve remained in my classroom for two hours a day after school to teach extra subjects.
As many new teachers will admit about themselves, I was completely incompetent during my first few years in the classroom, but at least I figured out one thing. With apologies to Paul Anka and Frank Sinatra, I was going to do it my way. I discovered I wasn’t going to be happy living a life to please others. I needed to live a life helping others. I wanted to be in a school where children didn’t go to hotels. I desired to go where children not only didn’t own books but didn’t even know where the local library was. Sometimes fate deals you a good hand. As I was fretting over my unhappiness at Camelot, I coached the school’s math team and it won a district championship. As I proudly left the scene of my team’s glory, a principal from a school across town approached me. His team of youngsters had done very poorly that day, and I noticed them walking to their bus with their heads down. This principal had heard about me from my current principal, who had complained about me at administrative meet- ings; my current leader had said I was a talented young man but ”difficult to control.” This gentleman from across town asked if I would like to transfer to his school, where the teaching would be tougher. But he promised to stay out of my way. It was an intriguing invitation. In his words, he was inviting me to leave Camelot and come to the Jungle, as he nicknamed his school. The man was shrewd-I have to admit it. He baited the hook and caught me easily. More important, he was totally honest about staying out of my way: the day I began at his school, he retired. I will never forget his wry smile and wink the day he stopped by my classroom to both greet me and say farewell. So the following year I found myself in the Jungle, a school twenty minutes away from Camelot, though it might as well have been twenty light-years. The school was so crowded that students played handball at recess against class- room doors. Over two thousand children attended the school, and all were fed breakfast and lunch there every day. Practically no student tested at grade level. No one spoke English as a first language at home. The test scores were so low that I doubt cheating would have helped much. Trying to replicate what little success I had had at my first school, I planned a weekend trip to the Shakespeare Festival in San Diego. During the orientation meeting for parents and children, there were only a few questions. Parents wanted to know if their children would need passports. Were the children going to be in danger from the INS for leaving Los Angeles? The children wanted to know if there were bathrooms and beds at the hotel. Would there be a telephone to enable them to call home? No one mentioned Hawaii. And so I left the perfect school and perfect situation to go to a place where I have often failed, been hurt, and been downright miserable. It certainly hasn’t been a picnic. But I have never regretted avoiding the path of least resistance. At first I didn’t know how to negotiate this new course, but in the years to come I would discover many of the ways to stay it. One thing was certain: Robert Frost was a wise man.
運動會
很漂亮、人工的環境...怡然園 很可憐的螢火蟲數量... 失焦的聚會... 反正小朋友高興就好...
到了這個年紀,交朋友可是越來越挑剔 I'm talking about myself, not LEO. 原先以為為了兒子,和同學的父母拉咧是輕而易舉、使命必達,現在才發現,朋友真是寧缺勿濫的好...
This is what he said during the session. "如果在我所說的故事中,能有任何一個對某一個小朋友產生一輩子的影響,那我就滿足了" 讚,給你鼓鼓掌 "如果我告訴他,這句話你這輩子一定要記住,而只要有一個小朋友真的記住了,那我就滿足了" 我不知道別人如何想,但是,如果我是小朋友,你有權利告訴我什麼是一輩子都要遵循的嗎? 對於呼召這件事,我還是沒辦法認同他所解釋的,也認為他解釋得很心虛,"由上帝來的感動"...
LEO : 媽,我的浴巾不見了,妳去幫我看看是不是在房間裡... 媽 : 如果要我幫你找,先讓我打一下屁股(光的) LEO : 今天是國際不打小孩日 媽 : 今天不是4月30日,今天是29日 LEO : 半夜了,半夜了...
今天早上起來第一件事就是找小乖... 瞄了一下老鼠們,ㄟ,怎麼四隻老鼠都在? 小乖怎麼又回到籠子裡了?難道昨天晚上爸爸騙我? 後來,我才知道,昨天晚上,小乖經過了一下午的遊蕩後,她跑回來找她爸...吱吱的叫聲引起了爸爸的注意,才知道小乖回來了... 這些老鼠真的跟以前印象裡的那種黑黑的老鼠不一樣,雖然還是蠻野的,可是必要時,他們還是回來找主人...
哎呀,自找麻煩
晚上要出門前逗弄了一下老鼠們,發現小乖不見了,原先以為她在爸爸那兒,就沒有再追問...沒想到,等LEO睡著後再來看他們,卻發現還是少一隻,趕緊問爸爸,爸爸說他那兒沒老鼠,慘了...小乖不見了... 可惡的爸爸,原來是他下午和老鼠玩時忘了把籠門關上,現在小乖不見了啦...氣得不想和爸爸說話,爸爸也滿頭大汗的在家裡找...沒辦法,就是找不到...只能希望小乖會像上次小壞一樣到我腳邊來找我,否則明天怎麼和兒子交代?
今天幫LEO到元亨寺點光明燈,順便到忠烈祠走走... 一路上看到跟愛河的風帆、騎腳踏車的人、重型機車的人、表演用機車的人,高雄的風貌真的跟以前不一樣了...政策的改變、公共建設當然和這些不同的風貌有關...
媽咪,是妳比較在意吧...
你一定沒想過心臟病也可以這麼玩 今天上完小提琴課後,我們一起去巴木吃飯 焗烤要等比較久,所以我們就先玩牌 來玩心臟病吧...輸的人要被彈耳垂 因為LEO的反應還是比較慢,所以每局最後都要被我彈耳垂 彈到最後他有點生氣了,就在搶拍時用力的打我的手背... 突然,他對我奸詐地笑了笑,他說輸了也沒關係,因為接下來,每次在搶拍牌時他都非常用力的打我的手,而最後我卻只能彈他的耳垂一下,嗚,我不玩了啦...反應快還要被打,最後就算贏了,手背也紅透了啦...
處罰
螞蟻
今天開始動工 代表灰頭土臉的日子來臨 只要忍受幾天,新浴室就做好了 可是,我的衣服全是一層灰了...頭大中...
距離初相識已有二十年,不知大家變成了什麼樣子... 希望大家都是幸福而快樂的
還剩高麗菜和排骨
青菜高麗菜 三杯雞 虱目魚肚
沒辦法用晒的,只好用微波和炒鍋來做 大熱天的,做的我汗流浹背 LEO,你的假性近視再不好我也沒辦法囉...
炸豬排 炸鮮菇(讓我們一次炸個夠吧) 青江菜 蕃薯粉 高麗菜絲/白蘿蔔泥/沙拉醬 冬瓜蛤蜊湯/薑絲 蒜/九層塔 1.炸~ 杏鮑菇水洗.但是要馬上洗.馬上瀝乾.不要浸泡水 洗淨後.整枝杏鮑菇滾刀切塊狀 我試過需要三道手續.炸的才好吃 1.先沾太白粉 2.在沾蛋汁 3.最後沾酥炸粉(或地瓜粉) 然後油鍋油溫一定要高.在下炸物這樣才不會掉粉 炸物外觀呈微微變色.就撈起來 再次拉高油溫.再全部將東西下鍋在炸一次搶酥去油(約10秒即可) 就可以撈起來了....最後灑上一點胡椒鹽就可以上桌品嚐囉
天天買菜太辛苦 得一次採購多一點 應該要買到三天的份量才行
今天和LEO解釋月象的變化, 他問到,什麼時候太陽、月亮和地球會成為一直線,我便順便和他說陰晴圓缺的來由,我也想順便和他解釋月蝕的事,結果,我一定是太想睡了,我把它說成了"月狗食月",爸拔在旁邊一直笑個不停,並且和LEO說,嫦娥奔月時帶了二隻動物,一隻是兔子,一隻是狗... 我心裡在想,唬人,那裡來的狗,結果才發現,哦,我說錯了... 父子倆兒就在那兒取笑我,胡亂編起了嫦娥奔月的故事....
蒜蓉蒸大明蝦+豆腐 沙茶豬肉+青江菜(湯匙的部份要拍拍才會入味,很多人就直接丟下去炒,難怪都會有土味) 吼,有夠好吃...